It’s a big win for large telecoms like Bell, Rogers, Shaw, Quebecor and Cogeco who argued lower rates would harm network investment, including in rural areas

Its a big win for large telecoms like Bell, Rogers, Shaw, Quebecor and Cogeco who argued lower rates would harm network investment, including in rural areas
Anja Karadeglija
The CRTC decision caps off a two-year battle between large telecom companies and smaller internet service providers whose businesses rely on wholesale access to the networks of the big telecoms.Photo by Getty Images
Article content
A decision by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission  not to lower wholesale internet rates despite saying it would two years ago is a loss for Canadian consumers who will see their internet service prices go up, critics say.
On Thursday, the regulator said it would not implement the lower wholesale internet rates the rates smaller internet service providers (ISPs) pay big telecoms for network access after all.
Matt Stein, chair of the Competitive Network Operators of Canada, which represents smaller providers, said the decision came as a shock.
It is boggling to think the CRTC chose to reverse the decision that they spent three years making, he said.
Thursdays reversal will lead the rates that Canadians pay for internet to go up, in part because competitors in most cases have already forward priced in belief that there will be a substantial decline in rates, Stein said. That will now have to change, and those increases will lead to rises in internet prices across the board, he predicted.
Advertisement
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The decision caps off a two-year battle between large telecom companies and smaller internet service providers whose businesses rely on wholesale access to the networks of the big telecoms. It means the smaller, wholesale-based companies like TekSavvy and Distributel will have to keep paying essentially the same higher rates that preceded the 2019 decision to lower them.

  1. National wireless providers must sell wholesale access to regional carriers for seven years, CRTC rules
  2. Telcos threaten to pull rural internet investment after CRTC lowers wholesale rates

Its a big win for large telecoms like Bell, Rogers, Shaw, Quebecor and Cogeco who fought the new rates through every avenue available to them, arguing lower rates would harm network investment, including in rural areas, where telecom infrastructure is often dated and inadequate. They filed court appeals, petitioned federal cabinet to overturn the decision and asked the CRTC itself to review the decision.
Advertisement
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Last year, the Federal Court said the CRTCs rates stand and though the big telecoms appealed at the Supreme Court, that court declined to hear the case. The Liberal government also declined to overturn or alter the decision.
That left the ball in the CRTCs court, leaving it up to the regulator to decide whether to uphold the lower rates it established in August 2019. On Thursday, it said it would not, determining there was substantial doubt as to the correctness of the 2019 rates.
It said starting another process to review them would take too long, cause too much market uncertainty, and take too many resources away from establishing a new, disaggregated wholesale regime.
CRTC chairman Ian Scott said in an interview that the decision wont lead prices to go up because the lower rates were never implemented, calling that a false narrative.
Advertisement
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Why would it go up? he said. Im not buying this not as a result of the establishment of these rates. He added that the small telecoms that lowered their prices in anticipation knew the rates werent final, and that some of the companies have also raised them back up in the meantime.
It is up to them to choose their pricing, he said. Presumably they all make contingency plans.
That disaggregated regime the CRTC wants to move towards has been plagued by problems and seen no take-up from companies since it was introduced in 2015. Small ISPs said the regime had turned out to be unworkable, and the CRTC is currently in the process of reviewing it.
Scott said he couldnt state when the disaggregated regime would be put in place, but indicated that the delay could be because smaller providers prefer to have aggregated forever.
Advertisement
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Laura Tribe, executive director of advocacy group OpenMedia, said in an interview the decisions focus on the disaggregated model is really concerning, given that the CTRC first started consulting on it in 2013, issued a decision in 2015 and six years later weve yet to see a single wholesale connection over disaggregated wholesale rates.
While Thursdays decision is the final step in the appeal processes launched by the big telecoms in 2019, it doesnt necessarily mean the fight over wholesale rates is over. Parties who are unhappy with the CRTCs ruling have the option of filing another appeal in Federal Court, or turning to the federal government again.
How the Liberal government might respond is unclear, given that when cabinet declined to overturn the 2019 decision, then-innovation minister Navdeep Bains issued a statement sympathetic to the big telecoms arguments about investment that said the rates were too low.
But the Liberals also campaigned on internet service affordability in the 2019 election, Tribe pointed out. She said the decision actively undermines that.
A statement from current Innovation Minister François-Philippe Champagne said he will be reviewing the decision and its implications to ensure they align with our policy priorities of affordability, competition and innovation in the sector.
Share this article in your social network
Advertisement
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Advertisement
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
NP Posted
Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.
By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails. Postmedia Network Inc. | 365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4 | 416-383-2300
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notificationsyou will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.